Wednesday, January 15, 2014

To tweet or not to tweet

Greetings for the New Year. Me te Atua e manaaki e tiaki koutou katoa i tēnei tau o 2014.
Recently at the Sunday service I quoted from a blog that talked about a tweet sent out by Pope Francis. This raised a bit of interest (myself included, as I don't “tweet”) so I did a bit of research. One assumption was that twitter (the name of the application with which one tweets) is a young people thing. Apparently not, or not just young people.
The Pope is one example, Barack Obama another. In fact President Obama is in the top 10 of “follower” numbers, that is people who choose to receive a person's tweets. All the others in the top 10, however, are people who are just famous for being famous. The bulk of twitter seems to be all rather vacuous and a symptom of our dominant culture of celebrity. However, in its midst, Pope Francis is followed apparently by 11 million people over 9 different language accounts. One of His Holiness' tweets says: Holiness doesn’t mean doing extraordinary things, but doing ordinary things with love and faith.” In a way his twitter followers are like the crowds who gather in St Peter's Square: they want to hear words of faith and wisdom from someone they respect.
Some years back people used to gather in Cathedral Square in Christchurch to listen to the Wizard. Many years back, John Wesley stood in the midst of town centres to preach the gospel.
Twitter is defined as “a short burst of inconsequential information” and “chirps from birds”, which is exactly how its creators saw their product. But some twitter users are proving it has potential to share messages of value, snappy enough to hold in people's minds. (A tweet is limited to 140 characters.)
So when you tweet, you send forth to any who want to listen your gem of wisdom (or otherwise). I read that 40% is pointless babble, 6% self-promotion, yet what researchers call “conversational” and “pass-along value” together makes up 47%.
Facebook is more my kind of thing. If a tweet is like a soap box, Facebook is like a get together of family and friends. Potentially all of them in the one place at the one time. I don't usually share news about myself on Facebook – I mainly post photos when we go to interesting places. But when my appointment to the parish was renewed, that news I did share which saved a lot of phone calls. Facebook has been great for keeping in touch with people who are good friends but live in other parts of the country. Also I've reconnected with a lot of cousins and it's an easy means for sharing family information.
The key to Facebook, as I see it, is that I choose privacy settings that limit everything on my page to “Friends Only”.
(The Parish Facebook page is different – it's a public page, but publicity is what it is for, sharing news and making ourselves more visible on the electronic platform of the wider community.)
On Facebook we have a conversation as friends; we share interesting things we come across; and we fill in part the gap between the times we meet face to face. I've made the call that every Friend request I accept has to be of someone I have met in person.
Familiar to most readers of this newsletter will be email – which in many ways is an electronic version of letters in the mail – and skype – like telephoning, but with video and, once you have the computer and internet connection, no extra cost to anywhere in the world. Texting is also something of a commonplace, across a range of ages. Maybe it's a bit like morse code – sometimes it feels like you have to learn text code to make sense of it – but it really has taken quick and non-intrusive communication to a new level. Although in making that last point, it does depend on the receiver whether it in fact intrudes into the social interaction they are having when it arrives. When you send a text you are not requiring the person to answer it on the spot. But the sight of people sitting with others in a café and looking at their mobile phones is rather disturbing. What's the point of them being together?
The key to it is that the technology has a purpose. It is not itself the purpose. And that purpose is to communicate. Be it sharing news or views, keeping close as family across the distances, retaining contact and nurturing friendship, the point is people.
What is important is what helps feed relationships: what helps us be people in good relationships with others, with the world we live in, with God, whatever that might mean to each of us.

Rangimarie Peace Shalom, Robyn

No comments:

Post a Comment